lunes, 5 de noviembre de 2012

Paper 3: Book Review / Critique




Review: Writing Academically: A New Handbook to Guide the Road

Academic writing: A handbook for international students was comprehensively written by Stephen Bailey (2006), a freelance teacher and writer of materials for English for Academic Purposes.
Most international students need to write essays and reports for University entries, exams and coursework. However, writing good academic English is a demanding and complex task. Bailey (2006) has carefully designed this second edition to help students reach this goal. The handbook has an appealing and bright design, with a clear-cut organization of content, without becoming unwieldy. This new edition also has a companion website[1] that includes further exercises relating to the book’s current content, extra topics not covered in the print edition, a plagiarism quiz and a glossary of academic writing terms. 


Clearly organized and easy to follow, this handbook attempts to address a variety of writing needs. It is divided into four sections: Part 1, The Writing Process; Part 2, Elements of Writing; Part 3, Accuracy in Writing; and Part 4, Writing Models. The course explains the writing process from start to finish. Each part is explained, demonstrated and practiced. It covers from selecting suitable sources, note-making and planning to re-writing and proofreading.

There is increased coverage of plagiarism, argument, cause and effect, comparison, definitions and academic vocabulary and style. Different forms of writing, including reports and literature reviews, are also tackled. Cross-references allow easy access to those relevant sections students might need to consult, avoiding exhausting and time-consuming scanning the whole book. By providing the key, it fosters autonomy on university students. 

 It seems to have been developed in response to suggestions from both students and teachers. Featuring a new website and blog, the writer is in continual contact with doubts and suggestions, making that this book is not a one-way resource but rather a real discourse community. Actually, a third edition is soon being launched including those questions and doubts consulted on the blog which manifests Bailey’s (2006) critical approach to dealing with internet texts.


Genuine material taken from various areas of study is used throughout the volume making it attractive to readers. Some sources are: A typical maternal behavior toward feeding-disordered infants before and after intervention taken from Infant Mental Health Journal and Rural electrification programme with solar energy in remote region – a case study in an island taken from Energy Policy. So, Bailey's (2006) text also appeals to learners from various disciplines.

 If something has to be criticized, Butler (2012) puts it forward clearly:

Unfortunately, the book has limited use in the classroom. Correct responses to exercises are readily available to learners on the book's website making it easy for them to avoid actually doing the activities thus compromising the teaching process – it is difficult for teachers to assess their students. Furthermore, no teacher's manual or teaching aids are provided. Therefore, the book is more suitable for independent study than for use with an instructor. (para. 3)


Overall, all international students wanting to maximize and develop their academic potential can find in this easy-to-use book a valuable guide to deal with proper academic writings. This is a handbook that bridges the gap between simpler academic writing textbooks designed for English as a Second Language students and more hostile textbooks for novice native-speaker academic writers. Considering that Bailey (2006) welcomes feedback from both students and teachers, this handbook can be regarded as a work in progress and we can, thus, look forward to new editions with further improvements to satisfy the most critical eye.



References
Bailey, S. (2006). Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students. Second Edition. London: Routledge.
Butler, N. (2012) Bailey, S. 2006. Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students. Second Edition. London: Routledge.






domingo, 28 de octubre de 2012

Midterm Test: Outlines




Outline: Mobile Language Learning: “the Follow-up”
Purpose: this outline aims to provide an overview on Ballance’s (2012) technological-educational article describing how the ideas throughout the article are organized to criticize Stockwell’s (2010) research.
Audience: Language learning and technology journal readers. Educational professionals.
Thesis statement: The vocabulary activities in Stockwell’s (2010) study could have been replicated with pen and paper and were not suitable for mobile phones and the findings in Stockwell’s study seem to be obsolete, as smart phones have changed technology. 
I.      Technical words: What is MALL and CALL?
               a.      CALL: computer-assisted language leaning
           b.      MALL: mobile-assisted language learning
II.     Consequences of technological advances and innovations.
          a.      Stockwell’s (2010) MALL is outdated and obsolete.
          b.      Technology goes faster than researchers’ publications.
          c.      The revolution of Smart phones and Apps can be applied in the classroom
III.    Stockwell (2010) has been conservative and unimaginative in his activities.
         a.      The activities could be replicated with pen and paper.
         b.      There are limitations in Stockwell’s platform.
         c.       The same activities could have been done with a PC.
IV.     To exploit MALL potential
         a.       To be used when students are commuting (dead time).
         b.      To provide short activities, easy to download.
V.      Conclusion: a question that Stockwell does not seem to answer in his research
          a.       “Does MALL have the potential to supplement our existing language learning resources with something else, something designed to exploit the ‘dead spaces’ which MALL has brought to life and, if so, what effect would the platform have then?” (Ballance, 2012, p. 23)


References
Ballance, O. (2012). Mobile language learning: more than just “the platform”. Language Learning & Technology. 16(3), 21-23. Retrieved October 2012, from
Stockwell, G. (2010). Using Mobile Phones for Vocabulary Activities: Examining the Effect of the Pletform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num2/stockwell.pdf